What advanced stats say about every USMNT World Cu...
Get the Sports newsletter
Daily sports — scores, transfers, the storylines from the leagues you actually follow. Free.
- Stats Perform has collected event data and advanced metrics for every World Cup going back to 1966, providing the xG foundation for re-examining USMNT tournament history match by match.
- The 1990 squad, a young, mostly semi-pro group, was outscored 8-2 in the group stage; in the opener against Czechoslovakia, the Americans trailed 2.07 in xG after Eric Wynalda's 52nd-minute red card and allowed 22 second-half shots worth 4.2 xG.
- The 1994 run — America's beloved host-tournament showing — saw opponents generate 7.0 xG to the USMNT's 2.6 across four matches, with the round-of-16 loss to Brazil producing a lopsided xG of 3.50 to 0.13.
- The 1998 collapse in a group of death (Germany, Iran, Yugoslavia) ended with a 5-1 scoring deficit but a closer 4.5-to-3.3 xG margin, suggesting the US could 'easily have earned a couple of draws,' per the author.
- The 2002 opener against a Portugal side featuring Luis Figo and Rui Costa — a 3-2 US win — is cited as 'one of America's greatest World Cup performances,' with the US posting 1.73 xG to Portugal's 1.45 before holding off a late surge.
- The 2026 USMNT delivered 'three or four excellent and encouraging performances' and record TV viewership before a 'discouraging face-plant' against Belgium, reigniting debates about whether the program has stagnated despite more European-based players.
- The modern arc — overwhelmed (1990), overachieved (1994), stunk (1998), surged (2002), disappointed (2006), fine but unexceptional (2010, 2014, 2022, 2026) — frames whether fan narratives of a decade-long plateau hold up against the xG evidence.
Why it matters: For USMNT supporters and federation decision-makers, the article reframes decades of received wisdom: the cherished 1994 'we hung with the world' narrative and the rueful 'same old U.S.' 2026 framing both look more like luck-driven extremes than true performance signals. With more Americans than ever tuning in for 2026, the xG lens could reshape how coaches, broadcast partners, and MLS-marketing dollars evaluate whether the program is actually stalled or just oscillating around average — a distinction worth tens of millions in investment and attention.
Ask SkimNews
