Hormuz closure elevates Turkey as Eurasia's transit hub
Get the Geopolitics newsletter
Daily geopolitics — wars, elections, sanctions, the diplomatic moves that move markets. Free.
- International Energy Agency labeled the Hormuz blockade 'the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market,' noting that roughly 20% of global oil and LNG transited the 21-mile-wide strait before Iran's blockade.
- Middle Corridor (Trans-Caspian International Transport Route) and the Four Seas Initiative have emerged as two principal alternatives, with the latter linking the Persian Gulf to the Caspian, Mediterranean, and Black Seas via a Syria-Turkey transit corridor.
- Kazakhstan signed 29 MoUs with the U.S. valued at $17 billion in November 2025, while Azerbaijan became the first non-Central Asian state to join the C5 summit (renamed C6) following its 2025 peace deal with Armenia and the opening of the Trump-route corridor.
- Iraq and the U.S. released a joint statement in June committing to rehabilitate the defunct Kirkuk-to-Baniyas pipeline, a precedent the article cites for direct Gulf-Mediterranean energy connectivity that bypasses Hormuz.
- Turkey sits at the intersection of both corridors, leveraging Europe's scramble to replace Russian energy, Gulf states' search for non-Hormuz export routes, and Central Asian states' push for overland trade to position itself as an indispensable hub.
- Syria is positioning post-Assad Damascus as an energy transit state under the Four Seas Initiative, backed by U.S. envoy Thomas Barrack, with World Bank estimates putting reconstruction costs at $216 billion.
- U.S. strategic objectives behind both corridors include emancipating European energy sovereignty from Russian and Iranian dependence, enabling American commercial dominance in Middle Eastern infrastructure, and rewarding states aligned with the West, per the article's analysis.
Why it matters: Turkey's positioning at the intersection of both alternative corridors means it collects transit leverage from Europe, Gulf states, and Central Asia simultaneously, profiting from crises it didn't cause. The article itself warns this comes with a structural flaw: rerouting through equally volatile territories recreates the Hormuz-style chokepoint leverage in new hands, meaning the 'winners' may simply be trading one vulnerability for another.
