Veterans warn US landing could be 'more Gallipoli than Vietnam'
Why it matters: A potential U.S. ground war in Iran risks a devastating, long-term conflict with severe geopolitical and human costs.
- Virginia Burger, a Marine veteran and defense policy analyst, highlights the deployment of two Marine Expeditionary Units and an Army brigade combat team to the Middle East, suggesting preparations for a potentially perilous, extended endeavor like seizing Kharg Island, which some call a "suicide mission."
- Mike Prysner, Executive Director of the Center on Conscience & War, confirms that many military units are actively preparing for a major war, indicating a widespread readiness for conflict among service members.
- John Byrnes, a veteran and strategic director for Concerned Veterans for America, expresses certainty in the U.S.'s ability to deploy troops but grave concern about a long-term operation, predicting frequent casualties and extended timelines.
- James Webb, a national security consultant and Marine veteran, emphasizes Iran's mountainous geography and a population of 90 million as significant disadvantages for offensive operations, noting that fighting on an opponent's home turf always puts an invading force at a disadvantage.
As the Trump administration considers a ground deployment in Iran, military veterans are sounding alarms, fearing a protracted and costly campaign that could mirror the disastrous Gallipoli rather than a swift victory. They warn that despite significant troop deployments, the U.S. military may be ill-prepared for Iran's challenging geography and a determined local populace, leading to heavy casualties and strategic setbacks.
