Direct vs Regular Mutual Funds: Differences Explained
Get the Finance newsletter
Daily finance — markets, central banks, M&A, the prints that move money. Free.
- Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) introduced direct mutual fund plans, which let retail investors buy into fund houses directly without an agent, bank, or broker.
- Direct plans eliminate intermediary commissions, lowering the expense ratio and delivering better returns than regular plans for the same invested amount, per the article.
- Regular funds route investments through banks, brokers, or financial advisors who charge a commission that is added to the fund's expense ratio, slightly reducing investor returns.
- Direct plans are available across debt, equity, and hybrid funds and can be purchased through the asset management company's app or website.
- Fund manager decisions and the underlying fund function are identical for both direct and regular unitholders; the only difference is the cost layer from the intermediary.
- Direct plans require investors to handle their own record-keeping, tax-filing documentation, and redemptions—services provided automatically in regular plans.
- Regular funds are positioned as a better fit for first-time investors who lack market knowledge, while direct plans suit those equipped to research funds and assess their own risk appetite.
Why it matters: The cost difference from intermediary commissions directly inflates the expense ratio on regular plans, meaning for the same money invested, direct plan holders keep more compounding working for them. First-time investors who skip learning the basics to chase that savings may end up mis-buying funds or neglecting tax paperwork—real costs that don't show up in the expense ratio.
