Australians Sue Government at UN Over Coal, Gas
Get the Energy newsletter
Daily energy & climate — solar, EVs, oil, the policy fights and tech bets shaping the transition. Free.
- Ten Australian litigants have asked the UN Human Rights Committee to declare it unlawful for Australia to continue approving and subsidising coal and gas for export without a plan to protect people from dangerous climate change.
- The case is the first legal claim taken to an international body since the International Court of Justice's 2025 ruling that countries can be sued over climate change; any UN decision is non-binding, but Australia — one of the world's largest coal and gas exporters — would be expected to respond.
- Dr. Barry Traill, a wildlife ecologist and volunteer firefighter, lost friends in the 2009 Black Saturday bushfires in Victoria and fought the 2019 Black Summer fires in Queensland, saying climate change is "already killing people and hurting lives, landscapes and communities across Australia."
- Brendon Donohue, who is blind and has mobility challenges, was trapped in his Brisbane apartment for 10 days during 2022 floods when a power loss disabled his building's lifts, intercom, and exits.
- Prof Anne Poelina, an Indigenous woman from Western Australia's Kimberley region, was displaced from the Fitzroy River area by catastrophic flooding and warned of "intergenerational loss of cultural knowledge" tied to physical presence on the land.
- Hannah White, senior lawyer with Environmental Justice Australia, said "climate harm caused by Australia's coal and gas doesn't stop at a border, and neither does Australia's responsibility for it"; the BBC has contacted Environment Minister Murray Watt for comment.
Why it matters: This is the first international legal action since the 2025 ICJ ruling opened the door for countries to be sued over climate change, and it targets Australia — one of the world's largest coal and gas exporters. The case reframes continued fossil fuel approvals and subsidies as a human rights violation, potentially reshaping how export-driven emissions are treated under international law.
