Daisy Dixon's 'Depraved': A History of Immoral Art
Get the Culture newsletter
Daily culture — film, music, books, the trends and ideas worth your attention. Free.
- Daisy Dixon publishes 'Depraved,' a book arguing art can be depraved in five ways: depicting immoral states, causing harmful actions, expressing dangerous messages, being created by immoral artists, or being made through morally suspect means.
- The book ranges across centuries and mediums — from Titian's 16th-century 'The Rape of Europa' to the video game 'Rape Day' — and includes a lengthy tangent on pornography alongside performance art involving live goldfish pulverized in blenders.
- Dixon argues good-faith intent doesn't shield art from depravity, citing Dana Schutz's 2017 Whitney Biennial painting of Emmett Till, created to express white remorse but condemned as appropriation of Black pain.
- The book traces art's corrupting power through a historical arc: from Plato's warnings, to the Marquis de Sade's influence on murderers Ian Brady and Myra Hindley, to 1990s accusations that Marilyn Manson corrupted disillusioned youth.
- Dixon rejects the historical practice of sequestering corrupting art in secret collections, instead prescribing that such works be confronted 'loudly, angrily, beautifully' through better speech, better art, and better curation.
- Claire Dederer's 2023 book 'Monsters,' which tackled what to do with great art by bad men, is cited as a recent forerunner to Dixon's project.
Why it matters: Dixon's framework lands in a live cultural standoff: museums face criticism whether they rewrite labels for controversial works or leave them untouched, and her prescription to confront rather than conceal offers institutions a philosophical counterweight to both 'woke' and 'problematic' critiques. For readers, the book reframes a binary censorship debate into a question of curatorial response — what speech, art, and presentation we bring to morally fraught works.
Ask SkimNews
