How legal challenges by college basketball players could lead to 11th hour transfer portal chaos — SkimNews
Get the Sports newsletter
Daily sports — scores, transfers, the storylines from the leagues you actually follow. Free.
- Filip Borovicanin and 14 other men's college basketball players received a temporary injunction from an Ohio state court judge on July 9, allowing them to play a fifth season in 2026-27 despite NCAA rules.
- Christopher Wagner, an Ohio state court judge, ruled in favor of the players’ injunction request, opening the door for them to enter the transfer portal and play next season.
- MJ Collins, Cincinnati’s incoming transfer and former Utah State leading scorer, is among the plaintiffs benefiting from the Ohio injunction and is now eligible to play for the Bearcats in 2026-27.
- Darren Heitner and Ryan Downton are filing similar state-level lawsuits in Georgia, Tennessee, California, and North Carolina on behalf of players seeking fifth-year eligibility, including former UCLA point guard Donovan Dent.
- Cade Tyson and Brock Wisne are lead plaintiffs in a federal class-action lawsuit filed in Colorado federal court that seeks to extend eligibility to all players who completed their fourth season in 2025-26.
- The NCAA condemned the Ohio ruling as 'wrong' and announced it will immediately appeal, arguing that retroactive eligibility would disrupt rosters and harm incoming student-athletes.
- The ACC, Big 12, Big East, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC jointly stated that granting fifth-year eligibility to recent seniors would create 'significant roster instability' and take spots from recruits.
Why it matters: If courts uphold fifth-year eligibility for players who were seniors in 2025-26, programs like Gonzaga, LSU, and St. John's may scramble to adjust rosters at the last minute, while incoming recruits could lose spots promised to them under prior recruiting agreements.
Ask SkimNews
