10 Years Ago, the Philippines Won a Major Victory in the South China Sea. Did It Matter?
Get the Geopolitics newsletter
Daily geopolitics — wars, elections, sanctions, the diplomatic moves that move markets. Free.
- The Hague arbitral tribunal ruled in July 2016 that most of China's claims to the South China Sea were invalid under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, handing the Philippines what the article calls a 'huge victory.'
- Beijing dismissed the verdict as 'nothing but a scrap of paper' and has not retreated from its claims by 'a single inch' in the decade since.
- Chinese coast guard vessels continue to harass Philippine coast guard ships and fishermen with water cannons, military-grade lasers, and ramming attempts, per the article.
- The piece characterizes the South China Sea as 'one of Asia's most dangerous flashpoints,' where high-seas brawls and naval ramming have become routine and a larger conflict is 'one mistake away.'
- The article frames the verdict's legacy as an open question, asking whether 'one of the biggest international lawsuits in history' amounted to 'just a massive waste of time' given Beijing's continued defiance.
Why it matters: The 2016 ruling established a clear legal precedent under UNCLOS but lacked enforcement teeth, leaving the Philippines with a moral and diplomatic win while China operates as if the verdict never happened. Philippine fishermen and coast guard crews absorb the daily cost of that gap in waters the tribunal declared Manila had rights over.
