Judge Dismisses Lawsuit From Paramount Streaming Subscribers Seeking to Block Warner Bros. Merger
Get the Culture newsletter
Daily culture — film, music, books, the trends and ideas worth your attention. Free.
- Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín dismissed the consumer lawsuit challenging the $111 billion Paramount-Warner Bros. merger on Wednesday, ruling the five Paramount+ subscribers — three current and two prospective — lacked standing and failed to establish cognizable antitrust harm.
- Plaintiffs may revise and refile, as the judge found their claims of "lower quality and variety" and "decreased consumer choice" amounted to boilerplate unsupported by plausible facts.
- Martínez-Olguín will also preside over separate antitrust cases brought by 12 state attorneys general and the Writers Guild of America, both set for trial on March 2, 2027.
- Paramount-Skydance CEO David Ellison argued in a New York Times op-ed that opposition to the merger isn't really about market consolidation but about trust in his stewardship of CNN.
- Ellison acknowledged his ties to President Donald Trump and recent "60 Minutes" controversies have made Hollywood nervous about CNN's future, while pledging editorial independence for the network's newsrooms.
Why it matters: The consumer lawsuit was the weakest of the legal challenges — the same judge now faces the far weightier state AG and WGA antitrust cases in a March 2027 trial that will test whether the $111 billion deal survives. Ellison's op-ed reframes the entire fight as a battle over CNN's editorial future under a Trump-aligned steward, shifting the debate beyond market-share economics.
