Trump Ties Iran Deal to Abraham Accords
SkimNews Take
The Abraham Accords, initially focused on Israel-Arab normalization, are now being repurposed as a tool to pressure Iran, demonstrating a flexible application of diplomatic frameworks beyond their original scope.
Get the Geopolitics newsletter
Daily geopolitics — wars, elections, sanctions, the diplomatic moves that move markets. Free.
- Trump announced in a Truth Social post that he spoke with leaders of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan and Bahrain, urging them to join the Abraham Accords as part of a broader Iran peace settlement, though Israeli PM Netanyahu was reportedly not part of the call.
- Pakistan rejected the proposal outright, with Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif telling Samaa TV that joining the accords would clash with Pakistan's fundamental ideologies.
- Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Pakistan do not have formal diplomatic relations with Israel, while Egypt and Jordan already recognized Israel through separate 1979 and 1994 peace agreements, and Turkey — which recognized Israel in 1949 — has suspended bilateral trade over the Gaza war.
- A US official told Axios that leaders on the call — especially from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Pakistan — were stunned into silence, prompting Trump to joke and ask whether they were still there.
- Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has said Saudi Arabia would consider joining the accords only with a clear path toward Palestinian sovereignty, a condition that Israel's far-right government actively opposes.
- Iran says nuclear issues should be addressed in later talks and wants frozen assets released and US sanctions lifted, while maintaining the Strait of Hormuz will remain under its management.
- Netanyahu has announced intensified strikes in Lebanon against Hezbollah despite a nominal cease-fire, and Iran insists any peace agreement must include Lebanon — a military posture the source flags as a direct threat to the broader negotiation.
Why it matters: Trump is conditioning any Iran peace settlement on demands that several Arab and Muslim states are structurally unable to accept — Pakistan calls it ideologically impossible, Saudi Arabia ties it to Palestinian statehood that Israel rejects, and continued Israeli strikes in Lebanon give Iran reason to walk away. The result is a maximum-ambition, minimum-consensus proposal that risks collapsing into paralysis rather than producing a grand bargain.
Ask SkimNews
