Schools Push Back on Big Tech's AI Classroom Playbook — SkimNews
Get the Tech newsletter
Daily tech — startups, AI labs, chips, the launches that shape the next decade. Free.
- Natasha Singer's new book "Coding Kids" documents how Apple, Microsoft, and Google embedded their own tools into school curricula over 15 years through AP courses, low-cost hardware, and the Classroom app.
- Apple and Microsoft each built AP Computer Science Principles curricula featuring proprietary tools like Apple's Swift and Microsoft's Minecraft — what Singer likens to "Pfizer AP Biology."
- Google distributed low-cost Chromebooks that became ubiquitous across schools through the 2010s, with adoption accelerating during COVID shutdowns, positioning it to push generative AI when it took off.
- Code.org launched with a celebrity video featuring Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, then ran an "Hour of Code" campaign that drew millions of students into brief coding introductions nationwide.
- New York City banned elementary and middle schools from letting students use AI in classrooms for the coming school year, and Los Angeles announced an even broader restriction including high schoolers days later.
- Parents and teachers are organizing a "vibrant grassroots movement" against classroom screen- and AI-ification, per Singer — a marked contrast to the limited pushback she documented during the earlier coding push.
Why it matters: Singer's central worry is "collective amnesia": the same playbook that trained a generation on proprietary tools — and left many graduates facing a diminished coding job market — is now being deployed for AI. The difference this time is organized resistance: NYC and LA's AI classroom bans signal districts want curriculum priorities set by educators, not vendors.
Ask SkimNews
