Usyk-Verhoeven appeal dismissed: Stoppage after bell
Get the Sports newsletter
Daily sports — scores, transfers, the storylines from the leagues you actually follow. Free.
- Mark Lyson told the Middle East Professional Boxing Commission he "had already seen enough" and "decided I wanted to stop the contest" in the 11th round, unequivocally stating his intent to halt the bout in Egypt last month.
- Rico Verhoeven appealed on the basis that the stoppage came after the official bell; the commission agreed the fight was concluded after the bell sounded but said it had no bearing on the outcome and dismissed the protest.
- The MEPB ruled Lyson acted in good faith with "the paramount objective of boxer safety," and said the result could only have been overturned if the referee had not acted as he did — the commission stressed the referee is "the sole arbiter" with authority to stop a contest at any time.
- Scorecards at the time of the stoppage read 95-95, 95-95, and 96-94 in favor of the 37-year-old Verhoeven, a kickboxing legend competing in only his second professional boxing fight.
- A timing discrepancy flagged by official timekeeper Brad William did not meet the commission's threshold to overturn the decision, with the panel calling it "at its highest, a procedural timing discrepancy" that did not constitute bad faith, corruption, or arbitrariness.
- Dr. Neil Scott's medical evidence confirmed Verhoeven was medically stable after the contest and did not undermine the referee's real-time safety assessment.
- Verhoeven said fans were denied a 12th round and called for an immediate rematch against unified heavyweight world champion Usyk, who retained his world heavyweight titles.
Why it matters: The ruling lets Usyk keep his heavyweight titles and shuts the door on a rematch Verhoeven says fans were owed, while the commission's "sole arbiter" doctrine gives referees wide latitude on stoppage timing — a standard that will likely govern future appeals, not just this one.
