Judge dismisses Trump Harvard antisemitism lawsuit
Get the Geopolitics newsletter
Daily geopolitics — wars, elections, sanctions, the diplomatic moves that move markets. Free.
- Judge Richard Stearns dismissed the DOJ's March lawsuit against Harvard, finding the cited incidents were "too isolated and episodic" to support an ongoing Title VI civil rights violation.
- The Department of Justice had alleged Harvard's "faculty and leadership turned a blind eye to antisemitism and discrimination against Jews and Israelis" during pro-Gaza campus protests.
- Harvard has stood apart from Columbia, Northwestern, and Cornell — all of which reached multimillion-dollar settlements — and successfully challenged Trump's $2.2bn federal funding freeze, which another judge ruled unlawful last year.
- The American Association of University Professors reported in November 2025 that the majority of federal civil rights complaints driving these investigations came from "people and organisations who have no relationship with the schools under investigation," not from students.
- Columbia protest leader Mahmoud Khalil, targeted for deportation over his role in the demonstrations, filed a July civil rights lawsuit alleging a "public-private" partnership — pointing to the Heritage Foundation's "Project Esther" report — to silence pro-Palestine voices.
- The AAUP report warned that a longstanding "Palestine exception" to the First Amendment now risks becoming "a pretext for erasing the norm altogether" in academic freedom.
Why it matters: The ruling adds another legal defeat to the administration's campus antisemitism campaign and reinforces Harvard's position as the only top university to refuse settlement. The AAUP finding that most civil rights complaints originate from outside the universities directly undercuts the evidentiary basis for investigations that have already triggered $2.2bn in frozen Harvard funding and multimillion-dollar payouts from peer institutions.
Ask SkimNews
