Emily Wilson Slams Nolan's Odyssey as 'Abysmal'
Get the Culture newsletter
Daily culture — film, music, books, the trends and ideas worth your attention. Free.
- Emily Wilson, the classicist whose 2017 translation Nolan cited in early publicity for the film, published a London Review of Books essay calling Nolan's Odyssey "abysmal," with "underdeveloped" characters and a "confused" vision featuring his "usual combination of grandiosity and superficiality."
- Wilson wrote that the film "has nothing convincing to say" about time, memory, history, war, or family, that its narrative structure is "gimmicky," and that she "would be ashamed to have written any part of this script."
- In a Sunday Times interview, Wilson said the film "didn't land emotionally for me at all" and "it's not very well written," adding: "Do I really care if this guy gets back to his wife? You haven't given me any reason to."
- Wilson, department chair and professor of classical studies at the University of Pennsylvania, still praised Nolan's cultural impact, saying he "is doing his best to get the general public reading again" and that Odyssey translations including hers are "flying off the shelves."
- Despite her criticism, Wilson said the release is "still an event to celebrate" and suggested the film might persuade "a few college administrators not to cut their literature, language and history departments."
Why it matters: Wilson's critique carries unusual weight: she is the credentialed Homeric scholar whose 2017 translation Nolan himself cited to build early buzz for the adaptation. Her essay simultaneously acknowledges the film's tangible cultural benefit — translations selling briskly, potential preservation of literature departments — while arguing the blockbuster betrays the source material's psychological and ethical depth. That tension reframes a record-breaking commercial hit as artistically compromised in the eyes of the very scholarly tradition it claimed to honor.
