Trump’s love of fossil fuels is about more than money | Moira Donegan — SkimNews
Get the Energy newsletter
Daily energy & climate — solar, EVs, oil, the policy fights and tech bets shaping the transition. Free.
- EPA announced it will lift limits on carbon emissions from coal- and gas-burning power plants, reversing Biden and Obama-era climate policies as part of a broader Trump deregulatory push that has also loosened carbon limits on vehicles and household appliances.
- Fossil fuel companies donated at least $75 million to Trump's campaign, with oil and gas firms giving nearly $12 million to his 2025 inauguration fund; Energy Transfer Partners and its CEO alone contributed at least $25 million.
- Virginia Tech professor Cara Daggett's 2018 paper "Petro-Masculinity: Fossil Fuels and Authoritarian Desire" frames the right's energy posture as driven by a masculine ideal — pumpjacks, big trucks, cowboy hats — that views green energy as effeminate.
- China has surpassed the US in solar panel production, a competitive shift the column cites as evidence that the Trump administration's energy posture is sacrificing US advantage for cultural symbolism.
- In 2022, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 along party lines that the EPA lacks independent authority to regulate carbon, clearing the legal path for the current rollback.
- Trump characterized energy industry donations during his 2024 campaign as part of a "deal," per the column, underscoring the explicitly transactional framing on top of the ideological one.
Why it matters: The Trump EPA's lifting of carbon limits on coal and gas plants follows at least $75 million in fossil fuel donations and a 2022 Supreme Court ruling stripping the EPA's regulatory authority, while the column argues these choices reflect a cultural commitment to fossil fuels as masculine symbols — a posture that comes as China has surpassed the US in solar panel production.
Ask SkimNews
