OpenAI, Anthropic Lobby Against Chinese Open-Weight AI
Get the Tech newsletter
Daily tech — startups, AI labs, chips, the launches that shape the next decade. Free.
- Moonshot AI's Kimi launch reignited debates around American competitiveness and open versus proprietary AI, prompting OpenAI and Anthropic to reportedly lobby regulators with concern about open Chinese models
- OpenAI strategic futures head Dean Ball publicly posted that the US should create regulatory FUD to undermine open-weight Chinese models — Ball later backed away from the argument after pushback
- TechCrunch Equity hosts Anthony Ha, Sean O'Kane, and Kirsten Korosec noted the panic mirrors prior freakouts like DeepSeek's launch, and that a week later "nobody's feeling like the end is nigh"
- Kimi demonstrated a viral 30-minute macOS graphical replication that TechCrunch's Sean O'Kane called impressive but "not an OS" — an example of the industry jumping at demos without substance
- Kirsten Korosec argued restrictions would benefit OpenAI specifically and force enterprises to use proprietary frontier models: "Are we accelerating and ensuring that Americans win the AI race, or are we ensuring that certain frontier labs do better than others?"
- David Sacks, who served as the Trump administration's AI czar and now holds a different role in the administration, used China competition framing to argue against data center opposition and tighter AI regulation on X
Why it matters: The lobbying push reveals that calls to ban Chinese open-weight models would functionally protect OpenAI and Anthropic from cheaper, open competition rather than address a specific national security threat. Korosec cited reporter Tim Fernholz's analysis identifying protectionism and "who wins the race" as the primary drivers of the panic, not the underlying technology.
