Virality Is a Broken Metric for Real Trends
Get the Culture newsletter
Daily culture — film, music, books, the trends and ideas worth your attention. Free.
- Ruby Thelot, a cyber-ethnographer at NYU, frames the internet as 'balkanized' into 'digital islands,' arguing virality now spreads between subcultures rather than reaching the masses.
- Thelot invokes Goodhart's law to argue engineered virality severs content from inherent cultural value, making it an outdated metric for real trend adoption.
- Thelot's analysis of roughly 1,000 Instagram and TikTok videos with over 1 million views found about 25% expressed negative dating sentiment, leading him to call the 'heteropessimism' narrative a mirage.
- Prediction markets on Kalshi and Polymarket function as participation tools more than financial instruments, per Thelot, who compared them to group-chat meme-coin trading among young men from 2020–2024 in spaces called 'the trenches.'
- Thelot dismisses AI existential risk on the grounds civilization's bottlenecks are cooperation and coordination, not intelligence—attributing the intelligence-supremacy belief to eugenicist Francis Galton and warning it sidelines emotional, bodily, and artistic intelligences.
- Thelot's book 'In Defense of Being-On-Line' publishes this fall.
Why it matters: For journalists, brands, and platform designers, Thelot's framework reframes viral metrics as artifacts of algorithmic feed engineering rather than evidence of cultural shifts—his ~25% finding directly undercuts the heteropessimism narrative that drove Bumble's May decision to kill its swipe feature and rebrand around AI.
Ask SkimNews
