Saltburn Player Suspended Over Finger-Clicking Cheating Claim

Get the Sports newsletter
Daily sports — scores, transfers, the storylines from the leagues you actually follow. Free.
- Brian Devine, a Saltburn Cricket Club second XI player, has been suspended after being accused of clicking his fingers at the moment the ball passed an opponent's bat, mimicking the sound of an edge to fool the umpire.
- Wicketkeeper Josh Bowes is identified by Agnew as the decisive witness — and the 'star witness for the prosecution and the defence' — whose honesty will determine whether the alleged cheating actually occurred.
- Jonathan Agnew says the scandal exploded on social media because it is a 'cut and dried' controversy anyone can engage with, unlike judging whether a footballer dived, and cricket's 'Spirit of Cricket' debate makes such incidents uniquely magnetic.
- Agnew argues cheating is universal across professional sport — golf being the sole exception because of its self-policing nature — and that 'these things do happen in cricket' as players constantly push for any edge.
- Recounting his own Leicestershire days, Agnew recalls an unnamed opposing wicketkeeper who ran loudly on the spot to distract batsman Andy Roberts during his run-up, until Roberts warned him off with explicit threats.
- Agnew says Australian grade cricket is 'utterly uncompromising' and 'ruthless,' with sharp practice widespread, and calls for a 'full and fair investigation' to determine whether other Saltburn players knew about or participated in Devine's alleged scheme.
- Agnew cautions that until a proper hearing is held, verdicts reached from 'grainy video' alone are premature, and the club must establish whether teammates were complicit before passing judgment.
Why it matters: The case hinges on a single witness: Agnew explicitly identifies Josh Bowes as the only person who can confirm whether the finger-click actually deceived anyone, and without his testimony the accusation rests on grainy video alone. A proper hearing must also determine whether teammates were complicit, which would shift the scandal from one rogue player to a team-level integrity failure for grassroots cricket.



