Court: Pentagon's Anthropic Blacklist Was Unconstitutional — SkimNews
Get the Tech newsletter
Daily tech — startups, AI labs, chips, the launches that shape the next decade. Free.
- Judge Rita F. Lin ruled Thursday that the Pentagon's blacklisting of Anthropic was unconstitutional, calling Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's supply-chain-risk designation "arbitrary and capricious" and "unlawful retaliation in violation of the First Amendment."
- Anthropic refused to allow its AI to be used for mass surveillance of Americans or lethal autonomous weapons, while most other AI labs accepted expanded "any lawful use" terms from the Pentagon.
- After CEO Dario Amodei declined to bend — stating the company had "never raised objections to particular military operations" but opposed cases where AI could "undermine, rather than defend, democratic values" — the Pentagon named Anthropic a supply-chain risk and signed deals with seven other AI vendors including Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, and SpaceX.
- Judge Lin had already temporarily blocked the blacklist in March, writing that Defense Department records showed Anthropic was punished for its "hostile manner through the press," calling it "classic illegal First Amendment retaliation."
- Anthropic spokesperson Danielle Ghiglieri welcomed the ruling and said the company "remain[s] focused on working productively with the government to harness AI for our national security."
Why it matters: The ruling confirms AI labs can publicly refuse specific military use cases without triggering unconstitutional retaliation. Anthropic now has legal standing to rebuild its Pentagon relationship, but the practical damage is partially locked in — the Defense Department has already pivoted to seven other AI vendors, including OpenAI, Google, and SpaceX.
Ask SkimNews
