Philippines Files Scarborough Shoal Chart at UN
Get the Geopolitics newsletter
Daily geopolitics — wars, elections, sanctions, the diplomatic moves that move markets. Free.
- Philippines deposited Chart No. 1567 with the UN in July, setting out baselines, territorial sea and contiguous zone of Bajo de Masinloc (Scarborough Shoal) under Article 16 of UNCLOS
- Manila expressly linked the chart to its Maritime Zones Act and the 2016 South China Sea Arbitral Award, which ruled Scarborough a "rock" under Article 121(3) entitled only to a territorial sea, no EEZ or continental shelf
- Philippines lodged a separate partial submission on an extended continental shelf in the West Palawan Region with the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf the same week — two UNCLOS-based moves the article calls deliberate, not coincidental
- China rejected the filing, reasserted its claim over what it calls Huangyan Dao, and backed its position with joint People's Liberation Army and China Coast Guard patrols around the shoal
- Lowell Bautista, Associate Professor of Law at Western Sydney University, framed the strategy as "lawfare by accretion" — the Maritime Zones Act, Archipelagic Sea Lanes Act, diplomatic notes and chart deposits reinforcing a consistent legal position since the 2016 award
- Australia and other states are urged to cite the record, uphold UNCLOS rules and act consistently with them, per the article, with the filing offering a template for contesting asymmetric power without matching it ship for ship
Why it matters: The chart confers no new entitlement and leaves sovereignty untouched, but once lodged with the UN it becomes a permanent citable record — available to future tribunals long after today's coast guard standoffs fade. The article highlights the stark asymmetry: Beijing's rebuttal is backed by hulls in the water, Manila's by a document in a New York registry, with the author arguing international law's force is cumulative rather than immediate.
Ask SkimNews
