OpenAI claims Navier-Stokes solve; Clay Institute balks — SkimNews
Get the Tech newsletter
Daily tech — startups, AI labs, chips, the launches that shape the next decade. Free.
- OpenAI announced it solved the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem — a Millennium Prize math challenge — using an unreleased model, with CNBC reporting completion "in 88 hours."
- OpenAI conceded it "cannot rule out that de-identified data" from mathematicians Buckmaster and Alpöge's use of its products helped train models behind the result, a hedge that became the story's flashpoint.
- An NYU mathematician accused OpenAI of "fighting dirty" on the career-making problem (TechCrunch), while Implicator.ai reported the Clay Institute refused to call Navier-Stokes solved after reviewing OpenAI's proof claim.
- Mark Chen, OpenAI's chief research officer, distinguished that no human or agent looked at user data as part of the Navier-Stokes effort, but noted OpenAI uses de-identified user feedback to improve ChatGPT and Codex holistically — "as does every LLM company."
- OpenAI publicly congratulated Levent Alpöge and Tristan Buckmaster on their mathematical work, while a viral @rynorhn tweet alleged Anthropic actually made the breakthrough and OpenAI rushed 10,000 agents at it to claim the headline.
Why it matters: The Clay Institute's refusal to validate the proof and the NYU 'fought dirty' accusation mean OpenAI's claim won't carry Millennium Prize credentials until peer mathematicians accept it — and the company's own hedge ('cannot rule out' de-identified usage) leaves it exposed to the exact accusation it's trying to defuse.
Ask SkimNews
