OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Problem Amid Math Backlash — SkimNews
Get the Tech newsletter
Daily tech — startups, AI labs, chips, the launches that shape the next decade. Free.
- OpenAI used roughly 10,000 agents and $30M in compute to solve the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize problem in 88 hours, according to internal claims.
- Tristan Buckmaster rejected an offer from OpenAI to be sole author on its breakthrough paper in exchange for excluding rival-affiliated researcher Levent Alpöge, calling it a 'bribe'.
- Sébastien Bubeck acknowledged offering Buckmaster unlimited compute and lead authorship but said OpenAI excluded Alpöge due to his affiliation with rival AI firm Anthropic.
- Andreas Thom questioned whether his prior interactions with ChatGPT contributed to OpenAI’s result, noting the company quietly updated its announcement to credit his earlier work.
- OpenAI denied that Buckmaster’s Codex prompts influenced its model, stating categorically they played no role in training or system behavior.
Why it matters: Mathematicians lose control over how their life’s work is used when AI companies treat foundational research as a competitive sport. OpenAI gains prestige and proof-of-capability, but at the cost of trust in scientific collaboration — a shift that risks alienating the very experts whose knowledge underpins these advances.
Ask SkimNews
