Atlantic: Leisure Shouldn't Have to Earn Its Keep
Get the Culture newsletter
Daily culture — film, music, books, the trends and ideas worth your attention. Free.
- The Atlantic's Wonder Reader newsletter curates recent and past articles arguing that leisure does not need to "earn its keep" and can be valuable on its own rather than as a productivity tool
- Krzysztof Pelc (2021) urged readers to stop treating time off as a productivity hack, warning that leisure feels worthwhile only when it accomplishes something — like exercise, skill-building, or recharging for work
- Arthur C. Brooks (2022) wrote that absolute idleness is both harder and more rewarding than it seems, pushing back against the urge to fill unscheduled hours with to-do lists
- Julie Beck (2025) argued that the logic of the "9 to 5" is creeping into the rest of the day, conscripting free time into the service of work
- Derek Thompson (2019) argued that "workism" — work morphed into a religious identity promising transcendence and community — is making college-educated Americans miserable
- Joe Pinsker (2019) found a Goldilocks effect: too little leisure produces stress, while too much makes people feel idle, with the happiest people sitting at a measured middle
Why it matters: Across five years of Atlantic coverage, a consistent pattern emerges: Americans — particularly the college-educated elite — increasingly struggle to treat unstructured time as anything other than raw material for work or self-improvement. The package reframes a cultural problem (leisure anxiety, workism, blurred boundaries) as a personal practice issue, and Pinsker's 2019 finding that *too much* idle time backfires complicates the simple "do less" prescription.
Ask SkimNews
