Is This What Comes After AI Slop? — SkimNews
Get the Culture newsletter
Daily culture — film, music, books, the trends and ideas worth your attention. Free.
- Daggermouth, a self-published Kindle sci-fi romance by H.M. Wolfe set in a surveillance state, was acquired by Simon & Schuster for seven figures in February after months on the USA Today best-seller list and a No. 1 ranking in Amazon's sci-fi romance genre.
- Tuhin Chakrabarty of Stony Brook University led a study that ran more than 14,000 Kindle ebooks through Pangram; roughly one in five scored as more than 25% AI-written, and Daggermouth returned 60%.
- The study flagged identical "rare expressions" shared between Daggermouth and other suspected-AI self-published ebooks, including a sentence about "sweat-slicked limbs" that appears word-for-word in another author's book.
- Mohit Iyyer of the University of Maryland said it is "almost statistically impossible" for a fully human-written book to register 60% AI on Pangram; Wolfe denied using AI through her lawyer, and Simon & Schuster stood behind the book, citing standard editorial processes.
- Chakrabarty's broader data found AI-assisted books account for roughly 20% of Amazon's ebook catalog, 12% of sales, and 10% of genre best sellers — numbers the researchers connect directly to commercial success.
- Jennifer Prokop of Kirkus contrasted Daggermouth's organic TikTok buzz with the second-best-selling AI-flagged book, Inked Athena by Nicole Fox (418 Amazon titles), noting romance readers "never talk about" Fox's work — a divide between AI-fueled metrics and genuine reader enthusiasm.
- Christine Larson of CU Boulder said she privately knows authors and editors using AI to accelerate output, arguing that humans working with AI can produce compelling fiction — but the industry's shaming culture, exemplified by death threats sent to openly-AI author Coral Hart, keeps the practice secret.
Why it matters: With AI-assisted books already making up roughly 20% of Amazon's ebook catalog and 12% of sales, the Daggermouth case shows that the publishing industry's enforcement mechanism — public shaming — is driving AI use underground rather than out of existence, leaving a seven-figure acquisition from a major publisher resting on authorship that no one can definitively prove or disprove.
Ask SkimNews
