London Museum to Reopen as 'Democratic' Social Space
Get the Culture newsletter
Daily culture — film, music, books, the trends and ideas worth your attention. Free.
- London Museum will reopen on 28 November in two historic former market halls at Smithfield in the City of London, converted over a decade into a new home after the institution vacated its Barbican premises in 2022.
- Director Sharon Ament said the museum would be a 'democratic' social space hosting afternoon tea, monthly dinner clubs and late-night DJ sets among the artefacts, adding: 'We are funded by the taxpayers of London, so our responsibility is to all Londoners.'
- The £437m project was funded by the Corporation of London and the Mayor of London, with additional donors including the National Lottery Heritage Fund.
- The museum's 7m-object collection includes the Cheapside Hoard of 17th-century jewels, the vest worn by Charles I at his 1649 execution, a chunk of the Whitechapel fatberg collected from sewers in 2017, and a Banksy-decorated police sentry box acquired in 2024.
- The Bloomberg Collection of 14,000 Roman artefacts — discovered during construction of the news organisation's headquarters in 2014 — was donated to the museum last year.
- Architect Paul Williams of lead firm Stanton Williams said the building was designed as 'an arena for public life,' with the two market halls connected by a glazed former London street and the Victorian General Market trading floor repurposed for a cultural events programme starting with 'London Tastes.'
- Ament said many museum directors were 'grasping towards' this social-space model but were often hampered by institutional culture or historic buildings, declaring: 'gone are the days where museums are led by [obsessions] of academics whose deep interest in Etruscan vases means that there is a very niche story to be told.'
Why it matters: A £437m publicly funded museum is explicitly abandoning the traditional object-centric model — Ament herself says colleagues elsewhere are 'grasping towards' this approach but lack the institutional freedom to attempt it, making London Museum a live test case for whether civic social programming can coexist with curatorial credibility.
