Musk redirects damages to OpenAI nonprofit
Get the Tech newsletter
Daily tech — startups, AI labs, chips, the launches that shape the next decade. Free.
- Elon Musk amended his lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman to specify that any recovered ill‑gotten gains must be returned to OpenAI’s charitable nonprofit arm, not to him.
- Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denied Musk’s request for punitive damages and barred a jury instruction on a ‘continuous accrual’ theory, prompting Musk’s filing change.
- Marc Toberoff told The Wall Street Journal the new remedy aims to return everything taken from a public charity and prevent future misuse, emphasizing Musk isn’t seeking personal profit.
- OpenAI posted on X that Musk’s case is a baseless harassment campaign driven by ego and jealousy, and that the lawsuit attempts to damage the OpenAI Foundation.
- OpenAI’s founders are alleged to have breached charitable‑trust promises, converting the nonprofit’s assets into a ‘wealth machine’ for themselves, Microsoft, and Silicon Valley insiders, and the suit seeks to unwind the for‑profit conversion.
Why it matters: Musk’s shift to directing any damages to OpenAI’s nonprofit removes the personal profit motive, but still threatens the company’s for‑profit structure; if the court enforces the remedy, OpenAI could be forced to unwind its conversion, affecting its investors and leadership.
Ask SkimNews
