FDA Urged to Reject Grail Cancer Test After Failed Trial — SkimNews

Get the Health newsletter
Daily health & science — research, biotech, public health, the studies worth knowing. Free.
- Grail's NHS trial enrolled 140,000 people but failed to show a reduction in late-stage cancer — the surrogate endpoint investigators chose instead of cancer death.
- An FDA advisory panel recommended approving Grail's multicancer blood test despite the negative trial result, leaving the agency itself to make the final call.
- The Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act, signed earlier this year, would mandate Medicare coverage of such tests upon FDA approval, bypassing the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
- Grail has been sued by its own investors twice (2024 and 2026), and former UK Prime Minister David Cameron served as a paid adviser during the company's NHS partnership.
- Annual screening of all Americans 50 and older would cost an estimated $60–$100 billion per year, based on a population of 120 million and a per-test cost between $500 (the Cologuard Medicare benchmark) and $949 (Grail's list price).
- The National Cancer Institute is preparing a major randomized trial using cancer death as the endpoint, which the author warns could be undermined if patients can already get multicancer screening covered by insurance.
- The author's core argument is that earlier detection doesn't equal fewer deaths, citing ovarian cancer screening as precedent: fewer late-stage cases, no change in mortality.
Why it matters: If the FDA approves Grail's test, Medicare is legally obligated to cover it, and the author estimates $60–$100 billion in annual costs to screen 120 million Americans 50 and older — while the more rigorous NCI trial that could actually answer whether the test saves lives may be undermined by early coverage.
Ask SkimNews




