Autism, ADHD and mental health review: What you need to know — SkimNews
Get the Health newsletter
Daily health & science — research, biotech, public health, the studies worth knowing. Free.
- The 600+ page review, commissioned by Wes Streeting 10 months ago, finds over-diagnosis is a risk for ADHD and autism — over 4% of UK children aged 6-17 have been diagnosed with autism versus an estimated true rate of 1-2%, though reviewers cautioned the underlying survey data is nine years old
- Review chair Prof Peter Fonagy explicitly said Streeting was "completely wrong" to suggest mental health is over-diagnosed, noting one in four 16-24-year-olds now experience mental distress, up from one in six 30 years ago, driven by anxiety, depression, self-harm and eating disorders rather than stable severe illness rates
- Young people face stark outcomes — about a third of 16-24-year-olds classified as NEET cite mental health or autism as a factor, and those diagnosed with ADHD before age 17 are four times more likely to be NEET than peers without a diagnosis
- The support system is "falling short," according to reviewers: a third of young people referred to mental health services wait over a year, and 90% of the 900,000 people waiting for ADHD or autism assessments have waited over three months, with NHS Alliance calling the system "in chaos"
- Half of NHS ADHD assessments and a third of autism assessments are delivered by non-NHS providers — charities and private firms not subject to NHS regulation — a gap the review says must be closed, alongside a proposed ban on direct-to-public advertising of assessments
- The review urges action within 12 to 24 months, including reassessing waiting lists so those most in need are prioritized rather than served first-come-first-served, with the government expected to detail its response in a mental health strategy by year's end
Why it matters: For the 900,000 people stuck on ADHD and autism waiting lists and the third of young mental health patients waiting over a year, the review's call to scrap first-come-first-served triage in favor of need-based prioritization could reshape who gets seen first. Schools, employers and welfare systems — not just the NHS — are named as part of a fragmented support structure that labels young people by deficit rather than potential.
Ask SkimNews
