US appellate court mandate affirms Sam Bankman-Fried conviction
Get the Finance newsletter
Daily finance — markets, central banks, M&A, the prints that move money. Free.
- US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a formal mandate affirming Sam Bankman-Fried’s conviction on seven felony counts and 25-year prison sentence, rejecting his argument that FTX had sufficient liquidity to repay investors
- Three circuit judges disputed Bankman-Fried’s claim that investors would have been made whole, stating that transferring customer funds to Alameda Research constituted fraud at the moment of misappropriation, regardless of intent to repay
- Circuit Judge Barrington D. Parker wrote that the wire fraud statute covers temporary misappropriation, reinforcing the lower court’s finding that customers were defrauded as soon as their money was moved
- New York court’s $11 billion forfeiture order was upheld as part of the criminal case, cementing the financial penalty against Bankman-Fried
- Sam Bankman-Fried now has few remaining legal paths to early release, with a Supreme Court appeal or presidential pardon among the only possibilities, though Trump has stated he has no plans to issue one
- US Senate unanimously adopted a resolution last month opposing clemency for Bankman-Fried, signaling strong political consensus against leniency
Why it matters: With the appellate mandate finalized, Bankman-Fried’s ability to challenge his sentence is effectively exhausted unless the Supreme Court intervenes or a president grants clemency—both unlikely given current signals. The ruling solidifies one of the largest financial fraud penalties in recent history and sets a precedent that intent to repay does not negate fraud charges when customer funds are misused.
Ask SkimNews
