Swift's 'Cleveland' Backlash Echoes McCartney's Love Song Scorn — SkimNews
Get the Culture newsletter
Daily culture — film, music, books, the trends and ideas worth your attention. Free.
- Taylor Swift released 'The Life of a Showgirl: The Encore,' an extended edition with four new tracks, but the earworm 'Cleveland!' — a love letter to husband Travis Kelce — drew virtually all the attention and the loudest backlash
- 'Cleveland!' triggered a wave of memes suggesting 'love and marriage have made Taylor Swift lose her dang mind,' even as three more reflective companion tracks — 'Patient Zero,' 'Pink Clouding,' and 'Babylon' — went largely undiscussed
- The song recounts recent insults leveled at Swift (that she can't dance, has no ass, has gotten old) before pivoting to celebrate that Kelce loves her anyway, with a spoken-word section that recalled the controversial bridge in 'Me!'
- Swift herself telegraphed the reaction at a pre-release Grammy Museum conversation with Harvey Mason Jr., saying she enjoys the 'human contradiction' between writing 'very simplistic and silly' songs and 'very detailed and deep' ones with 'tons of allegory'
- The historical parallel runs through the early-to-mid 1970s, when McCartney's love songs for Linda drew scorn from critics and a savage diss track from John Lennon in 'How Do You Sleep,' accusing McCartney of becoming a lightweight
- McCartney answered the pile-on with 'Silly Love Songs,' a deliberate F-you to Lennon and other detractors that became a No. 1 hit — the same pattern the Variety essay argues Swift is now navigating
- The author drew the comparison after attending an L.A. FYC screening of the McCartney & Wings documentary 'Man on the Run,' which devotes significant time to the resistance McCartney faced as his catalog turned domestic
Why it matters: The 'artist lost their edge to love' backlash is a recurring cultural reflex, not a new phenomenon: McCartney absorbed the same scorn in the '70s and answered it with the chart-topping 'Silly Love Songs,' which critics had tried to bury. The precedent suggests Swift's 'Cleveland!' pile-on will fade as a moment rather than a verdict, even as social media's volume makes it feel more consequential than the McCartney era's Rolling Stone letters.
Ask SkimNews
