STAT Names First Trust-in-Science Reporter — SkimNews
Get the Health newsletter
Daily health & science — research, biotech, public health, the studies worth knowing. Free.
- STAT appointed its inaugural reporter on trust in science, framing the beat as an examination of why patients lose faith in medicine rather than just cataloguing misinformation
- The unnamed reporter disclosed being 34, overweight, with high cholesterol, high blood pressure, severe ADHD, and taking a high-dose SSRI, and said he has tried the keto diet, compounded peptides, and supplements like NAC out of frustration with conventional treatment outcomes
- The reporter attended a Children's Health Defense conference in Washington — the organization RFK Jr. once led — where speakers claimed polio paralysis was caused by pesticides and that flu shots increase Alzheimer's risk, according to the account
- A 2020 study cited in the piece found only 50% of U.S. adults could identify a scientific hypothesis, and a recent survey found more than a quarter of respondents said raw milk is healthier than pasteurized, with another quarter unsure
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is quoted approvingly for saying the U.S. should care about people who believe they were injured by vaccines even if such injuries are rare, reflecting the beat's stated emphasis on empathy alongside fact-checking
- The new beat will scrutinize pharmaceutical company profit-seeking and doctor-patient interactions as drivers of distrust, not solely anti-vaccine activists, and is funded by the Dana, Greenwall, John Templeton, and Boston Foundations
- Francis Bond, founder of the pro-vaccine Jenner Society, predicted in 1902 that the anti-vaccine movement would be "stamped out" — a comparison the reporter uses to argue scientific knowledge alone has never been sufficient to restore trust
Why it matters: By launching a formal trust beat, STAT is institutionalizing coverage of an issue that now cuts through federal health policy under RFK Jr.'s HHS leadership, mainstream medical practice (antidepressants, vaccines, statins), and raw-milk-style fringe debates. The reporter's stated approach — calling out misinformation while explicitly empathizing with skeptics — signals a deliberate editorial shift away from dismissive coverage, though the piece offers no evidence such a shift changes patient outcomes or policy.
Ask SkimNews
