As fans reject AI-generated music, even boosters are drawing the line — SkimNews

Get the Culture newsletter
Daily culture — film, music, books, the trends and ideas worth your attention. Free.
- Spotify said it removed about 50 million songs considered AI slop from user recommendations over the past year; its editors said they do not program material identified as slop or spam.
- Spotify requires badges on profiles for nonhuman “AI personas” but not labels on individual AI-generated songs; it nevertheless allows generative-AI playlists and has promised a tool for remixes and covers.
- Grimes offered enthusiasts a free license to her voice three years ago but declined to generate her own music; Stereogum described her first album in six years, Psy Opera, as “AI-inspired but not AI-generated,” citing her insistence that its 70-person team receive credit.
- A$AP Rocky said a totally AI-generated song made only by prompting is “their thing,” while saying he makes his own music “practically — the right way.”
- Kelly Clarkson said she loves and uses AI artistically, but proposed a separate chart when AI artists compete with humans rather than sharing one chart.
- Billboard rankings showed most of the Top 10 albums foregrounding singers over analogue instrumentation and the top four Hot 100 singles bearing similar sonic signatures; they also placed the Beatles’ 1965 Rubber Soul at No. 4.
Why it matters: Spotify’s 50 million-song cleanup limits listeners’ exposure to low-quality AI output while still allowing generative-AI playlists and promising a tool for remixes and covers. Because Spotify badges profiles for nonhuman personas but not every AI-generated song, its policy targets “slop” and disclosure more directly than AI itself.
Ask SkimNews




