Hollywood Unions Dismiss AI Extinction Warnings — SkimNews
Get the Culture newsletter
Daily culture — film, music, books, the trends and ideas worth your attention. Free.
- The Verge reached out to Disney, Netflix, Amazon, Lionsgate, and AI-focused film startups about their reaction to existential AI warnings — none of the studios or startups responded.
- SAG-AFTRA chief negotiator Duncan Crabtree-Ireland said the union secured "enforceable, meaningful guardrails" on AI during the 2023 strikes, requiring studios to gain permission and compensate actors for digital replicas.
- Crabtree-Ireland called some extinction-level AI warnings potentially "hyperbole and overblown" but acknowledged former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon's exit gave those warnings "traction with the public."
- WGAE executive director Sam Wheeler condemned "tech oligarchs" whose "recklessness has been matched only by their rampant dishonesty," noting WGA members spent 148 days on strike in 2023 before studios agreed to AI safeguards for writers.
- Wheeler said the WGAE "has long warned that unregulated artificial intelligence poses an existential threat to workers, to our democracy, and to the world," but pushed for liability and regulation rather than apocalypse rhetoric.
- Wheeler listed worker disempowerment, internet degradation, disinformation, and rising energy costs as concrete AI harms, insisting "these harms are the result of decisions made by human beings."
Why it matters: The unions secured enforceable AI guardrails through the 2023 strikes — SAG-AFTRA's replica-permission rules and the WGA's 148-day-bargained writer protections — but those wins are contractual, not legislative. Wheeler explicitly warned that "collective bargaining is not a replacement for government regulation," leaving broader societal harms to be addressed through state-level action like New York's AI laws.
Ask SkimNews
