Balancer eyes wind-down after restructuring fails to revive revenue — SkimNews
Get the Finance newsletter
Daily finance — markets, central banks, M&A, the prints that move money. Free.
- Balancer proposed an orderly wind-down on its governance forum Monday after a post-exploit restructuring delivered products but failed to replace legacy v2 revenue, with Hardt stating: "The product worked. It did not sell enough."
- The November 2025 exploit stole $128 million from legacy v2 composable stable pools, and per DefiLlama data, Balancer's monthly protocol revenue fell from $1.13 million in October 2025 to $371,000 in November 2025 and just $56,781 by August 2026.
- Marcus Hardt, CEO of Balancer Labs, authored the proposal and admitted on X that "I underestimated how much the exploit would continue to limit adoption," noting the exploit "followed the name into every conversation since and made traction harder to build."
- Under the plan, BAL tokenholders would receive the protocol's remaining $9 million-plus treasury on a pro-rata basis by burning their tokens, with a first distribution scheduled for May 2027 and up to $400,000 set aside to fund the wind-down.
- The phased shutdown begins next month: new business development ends, liquidity providers get until October 30 to exit, and from November 1 Balancer runs only minimal infrastructure to support withdrawals before the DAO itself is dissolved.
- A snapshot vote is scheduled for September 25-29, with rejection leaving Balancer's lean operating framework in place—the same structure Hardt says structurally failed to revive revenue.
- The proposal comes roughly six months after Balancer Labs (the company) shut down in March 2026, when executives chose to keep the protocol running under a leaner team.
Why it matters: BAL holders now decide whether to reclaim a $9 million-plus treasury through wind-down or keep it inside a protocol Hardt says has structurally failed to generate revenue. Hardt explicitly warned that continuing on the current path "spends the treasury to arrive at the same place later"—so the September 25-29 vote is a real choice between distributing what's left now or letting it erode further under the same lean framework.
Ask SkimNews
