Isak’s Shirt Pull Went Unreviewed After No Appeal — SkimNews
Get the Sports newsletter
Daily sports — scores, transfers, the storylines from the leagues you actually follow. Free.
- Jurrien Timber had a handful of Alexander Isak’s shirt as Isak missed a header from Bradley Barcola’s cross; Isak did not appeal and referee Andy Madley saw nothing.
- Stuart Attwell decided the Isak incident did not contain enough for a VAR review, so the referee was not sent to the monitor and no penalty was awarded.
- Andoni Iraola, Liverpool’s manager, called Timber’s contact a “clear grab of the shirt” after the 1-0 defeat and said: “The answer is you have to dive, if you don’t dive they won’t call it.”
- Tony Harrington identified a tug on Calvin Bassey’s shirt by Brian Brobbey in February’s Sunderland-Fulham match and sent referee Craig Pawson to the monitor to give a penalty despite no on-field call.
- Darren Cann said the Isak incident had to be sustained holding and noted that Isak did not appeal; the law requires contact to impede an opponent’s movement before it becomes a holding offence.
- Roberto Rosetti, Uefa referees’ chief, said during the summer that “too many reviews” had prompted attempts to play for or earn video decisions, while officials now focus more on players who dive or embellish contact.
- Premier League has 14 subjective VAR reviews after nine rounds, matching last season, and has historically had Europe’s lowest number of interventions; the Key Match Incidents Panel counts only one missed VAR intervention this season.
Why it matters: The Premier League’s 14 subjective reviews after nine rounds and just one missed intervention counted by the Key Match Incidents Panel underpin video officials’ claim of balance. For Isak, the consequence is direct: without a visible appeal and sufficient impact, a disputed hold produced neither a VAR review nor a penalty.
Ask SkimNews
