Buckmaster Alleges OpenAI Used His Navier-Stokes Work — SkimNews
Get the Tech newsletter
Daily tech — startups, AI labs, chips, the launches that shape the next decade. Free.
- Tristan Buckmaster alleges OpenAI learned of his collaborative work with Anthropic's Levent Alpöge on the Navier-Stokes equations — a Millennium Prize problem — and used an internal model to solve it.
- Scientific American's Joseph Howlett compared the claimed feat to IBM's Deep Blue computer defeating Garry Kasparov in 1997.
- Business Insider, Quartz, TechCrunch, Wccftech, The Decoder, Unite.AI, and Analytics India Mag all ran versions of the allegation alongside Scientific American's lead piece.
- Tristan Buckmaster posted a public statement on his NYU page, while Sebastien Bubeck issued a LinkedIn clarification and Terence Tao weighed in via Mathstodon.
- Hacker News hosted a major thread, with the story also trending across Reddit (r/ChemicalEngineering, r/OpenAI, r/antiai, r/france), X (50+ posts from Thom Wolf, Boaz Barak, Natolambert and others), Bluesky, and Mastodon.
Why it matters: For OpenAI, the dispute puts its claim to a major mathematical breakthrough under direct public scrutiny, with the allegation now circulating across tech press, math forums, and AI-skeptic communities. With co-author Levent Alpöge at Anthropic — OpenAI's direct competitor — the incident also shows how research-credit disputes can map directly onto AI-lab rivalries.
Ask SkimNews
