Jury Rejects Musk's OpenAI Lawsuit in Under 2 Hours
Get the Tech newsletter
Daily tech — startups, AI labs, chips, the launches that shape the next decade. Free.
- Jury unanimously rejected Elon Musk's claims against Sam Altman and OpenAI, finding them filed outside the statute of limitations after less than two hours of deliberation on Monday
- Musk's lawsuit was valued at $134 billion to $150 billion across multiple outlets including Tech Times, Times of India, Entrepreneur, and CoinGape
- Musk called the verdict a "technicality" and plans to appeal, per Implicator.ai and the New York Sun
- Fast Company and Proactive Investors framed the verdict as clearing a major obstacle to OpenAI's blockbuster IPO
- Forbes characterized the ruling as setting "a dangerous precedent" in its headline
- The Atlantic labeled the trial "a waste of time," noting the jury never reached the substantive claims about OpenAI's structure or Altman's conduct
Why it matters: The verdict ends Musk's marquee legal challenge to Altman and OpenAI, with multiple outlets noting it clears a major obstacle to OpenAI's IPO. Because the jury ruled on statute-of-limitations grounds, the substantive allegations about OpenAI's for-profit transition and Altman's leadership were never adjudicated — and Musk's signaled appeal keeps the dispute alive on a different timeline.
