Premier League Has Little Appetite to Strip Man City Titles — SkimNews

Get the Sports newsletter
Daily sports — scores, transfers, the storylines from the leagues you actually follow. Free.
- Premier League clubs and organization show "little appetite" to strip Manchester City of titles won between 2009-2018, though the final call rests with an independent panel yet to hold a "sanction hearing."
- Manchester City was found guilty on most of 115 charges alleging inflated sponsorship revenue and "off the books" payments to circumvent financial rules; points deduction, fines, or expulsion are considered more likely than title-stripping.
- Premier League rules don't list title-stripping as a sanction but allow panels to impose penalties "as it shall think fit," theoretically enabling retrospective points deductions or trophy reallocation.
- Runners-up clubs who could receive reallocated trophies include Manchester United (2011-12, 2017-18), Liverpool (2013-14 Premier League, 2015-16 EFL Cup), Stoke City (2010-11 FA Cup), Sunderland (2013-14 EFL Cup), Arsenal (2017-18 EFL Cup), and Chelsea (2012-13 Community Shield) — with Chelsea's own 2010s era facing similar scrutiny for secret agent payments.
- Historical precedents for title-stripping include Juventus losing 2005 and 2006 Serie A titles in the Calciopoli scandal, Elgin City being stripped of the 1992-93 Highland League, and Lance Armstrong being stripped of seven Tour de France titles for doping.
- Compensation claims from rival clubs for lost earnings are "more likely" than title-stripping; one lawyer warned potential claimants — clubs, players, staff, agents — could be "endless and potentially so destructive to the whole ecosystem."
- Rodri, City's former midfielder, dismissed title-stripping talk on Friday: "What we did, they cannot take out of us... everything was deserved."
Why it matters: The Premier League's reluctance to push for title-stripping reflects concerns about commercial viability, diplomatic fallout with the UAE, and the slippery slope of retrospective punishment. But the threat remains alive because the decision rests with an independent panel, and rival clubs are more likely to pursue compensation claims that could expose the league to lawsuits from players, staff, and agents.
Ask SkimNews




