New Yorker Examines Sam Altman's Trust Amid Revolt
Get the Tech newsletter
Daily tech — startups, AI labs, chips, the launches that shape the next decade. Free.
- The New Yorker published a profile featuring interviews with Sam Altman and over 100 people assessing his trustworthiness, with some defending him and others labeling him a sociopath.
- The Verge and Marcus on AI both described Altman as “unconstrained by truth.”
- OpenAI’s CFO said “No” to an unspecified proposal and noted that Anthropic’s Claude model is losing popularity.
- Rohit highlighted that despite claims of Altman’s untrustworthiness, about 99% of OpenAI staff quit after his firing and later petitioned for his reinstatement.
- Aisafetymemes claimed OpenAI has tried to pit China, Russia, and the US against each other and is spending large sums to influence Congress.
- Alexander McCoy reported that Altman originated the “AI can’t be regulated because of China” argument in 2017, which was later used as a sales pitch.
Why it matters: The CFO's refusal and the decline of Anthropic's Claude popularity could tilt market favor toward OpenAI's offerings, while the mass staff resignations and petitions for Altman's return reveal internal volatility that could jeopardize OpenAI's execution of its ambitions and erode investor confidence.
