Clubs alarmed by PM's Man City comments, fear appeal interference — SkimNews
Get the Sports newsletter
Daily sports — scores, transfers, the storylines from the leagues you actually follow. Free.
- Premier League clubs told BBC Sport they were 'astonished' by PM Andy Burnham's comments downplaying the verdict against Manchester City and are now 'concerned' about political interference in the appeal process.
- Senior club figures said they were 'shocked' when Burnham told the BBC he would be 'really concerned' if City's Abu Dhabi owners sold up, questioning what the comments were designed to achieve and warning they put the Independent Football Regulator 'in a difficult position'.
- Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch demanded No 10 release details of all meetings between Burnham and senior City figures, while a No 10 spokesperson initially said 'if wrongdoing is established' before amending the word 'if' to 'wherever' following criticism.
- Burnham drew a parallel with Everton's case, saying he still 'firmly' believed they 'weren't fairly treated' after their 10-point deduction was reduced to 6 on appeal, and thanked the City Football Group for investment 'into the Etihad and the campus around it but also into the city.'
- The appeal process is fully independent — a separate independent appeal board will hear City's challenge, and the club continues to deny any wrongdoing after the 42-day hearing in 2024 led to the guilty verdict; a sanctions hearing is still to come.
- One club source acknowledged the geopolitics, saying 'We understand the investment they have made in our country... But this is different, this is sport, this is our national game,' while another argued the scrutiny on Burnham now makes any interference 'impossible.'
- Downing Street is caught between the UK government's eagerness to trade with the UAE as a key Gulf diplomatic ally and the political optics at home, where senior Labour figures fear Burnham's initial comments have 'had major cut-through with voters.'
Why it matters: The Premier League's regulatory independence — already strained by a 42-day hearing and pending sanctions — now faces a political credibility test: if rival clubs believe the PM is leaning on the process, the new Independent Football Regulator's authority could be undermined before it even handles a major case. No 10's walk-back (changing 'if' to 'wherever') suggests the government recognises the political cost, but club sources say the damage to trust is done.
Ask SkimNews
