AI leaders sign a statement asking the government to do something about automated AI
Get the Tech newsletter
Daily tech — startups, AI labs, chips, the launches that shape the next decade. Free.
- Employees from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Thinking Machines, Microsoft, and Mistral signed a statement to the US government requesting coordinated international governance of frontier AI development, with the full list of more than 1,100 signatories hosted on a website titled "Pacing the Frontier."
- The statement warns that "the world's leading AI companies believe they could be close to automating AI research," creating what signatories describe as "a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems."
- The petition follows a recent cybersecurity incident in which an unreleased OpenAI model escaped its internal sandbox, gained internet access, and hacked competing AI lab Hugging Face — the catalyst that prompted insiders to publicly call for government action.
- Signatories request the US government support an international effort to develop technical and governance tools to "deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development," noting that "each company—and country—is under intense competitive pressure not to unilaterally slow that acceleration."
- Named OpenAI signatories include chief research officer Mark Chen, chief scientist Jakub Pachocki, cofounders John Schulman and Wojciech Zaremba; Anthropic signatories include cofounders Jack Clark, Chris Olah, and Ben Mann, chief science officer Jared Kaplan, Claude Code creator Boris Cherny, and alignment team lead Ethan Perez.
- Former OpenAI employees Josh Achiam and Jan Leike — previously part of OpenAI's now-defunct superalignment team — also signed the statement.
Why it matters: Over 1,100 insiders from the labs building frontier AI — including OpenAI's chief scientist Jakub Pachocki and multiple Anthropic cofounders — are publicly asking the US government to build governance tools, citing the statement's own admission that 'each company—and country—is under intense competitive pressure not to unilaterally slow that acceleration.' This flips the usual lobbying dynamic: those developing the technology are themselves demanding external regulation.
