Where Man City's Inflated Transfer Money Actually Went — SkimNews
Get the Sports newsletter
Daily sports — scores, transfers, the storylines from the leagues you actually follow. Free.
- Manchester City spent roughly £1.2bn on players between 2009 and 2018 (~£900m net), more than any other club in that period, after the independent commission concluded the club had 'inflated' its accounts by more than £900m.
- Manchester City paid transfer fees to 46 different clubs across 19 national league systems during the period, with just over a quarter of total outlay going to clubs in the English top flight and equal amounts from eight Premier League and eight La Liga clubs.
- Wolfsburg sold Kevin De Bruyne to City in 2016 and immediately spent roughly half the fee on Julian Draxler, then dropped from second to eighth in the Bundesliga and narrowly avoided relegation in the next two seasons.
- Monaco sold Benjamin Mendy and Bernardo Silva to City in 2017, and within two years fell from champions and Champions League semi-finalists to nearly being relegated from Ligue 1, with their two direct replacements failing to make an impact.
- Arsenal sold four players to City between 2009 and 2018 — more than any other club — yet did not mount a serious Premier League title challenge during that decade.
- Sporting received no payments from City while rivals Benfica and Porto each received comparable sums; Sporting failed to win a Portuguese title between 2009 and 2018.
- Sell-on clauses meant indirect beneficiaries outside City's direct dealings: Queens Park Rangers earned about £9m from Raheem Sterling's 2015 move from Liverpool and Barnsley about £7m from John Stones's 2016 transfer — figures larger than most EFL player sales at the time.
Why it matters: Pro-Man City voices have argued that the club's 'inflated' spending benefited the wider game, but this analysis directly tests that claim by tracking the 46 clubs in 19 leagues that received payments. Several of the biggest recipients — Wolfsburg, Monaco, Sporting — declined during or after receiving their windfalls, weakening the 'net benefit to football' defense the club and its supporters are likely to deploy at appeal and shaping how regulators and pundits assess the ripple effects of the breaches.
Ask SkimNews
