Raknehaugen Mound Built After Landslide, Not King's Tomb
Get the Health newsletter
Daily health & science — research, biotech, public health, the studies worth knowing. Free.
- Lars Gustavsen published a study in the European Journal of Archaeology arguing that Raknehaugen — Scandinavia's largest prehistoric mound, located about 40 km from Oslo — was built as a ritual response to a landslide rather than as a burial for a high-status individual.
- LiDAR scans revealed an ancient landslide roughly 3,800 meters long, 20 meters wide, and about 40 cm high near the mound, which Gustavsen discovered "more or less by accident" while investigating the mound's landscape visibility.
- Dendrochronological analysis of 100 pine trees dates the mound's construction to around AD 551, approximately 15 years after the 536 AD Dust Veil Event volcanic eruption, during a period of prolonged cooling, crop failures, and famine across the Northern Hemisphere.
- Timbers from the mound were largely snapped rather than cut, felled too high for regrowth, and in many cases pulled up by the roots — unusual features consistent with trees sourced from a landslide rather than deliberately harvested timber.
- Three major excavations (1869–1870 by Anders Lorange, 1939–1940 by Sigurd Grieg, and a later reappraisal by Dagfin Skre) failed to locate a central burial; the only cremated remains found dated to 1391–1130 BC, centuries before the mound was built, and were likely deposited with soil used in construction.
- Mound construction required an estimated 450–600 workers plus 30–60 timber suppliers and culminated in a tent-like structure of roughly 25,000 logs sealed with sand and topsoil, with one researcher describing the timberwork as "unusually ugly."
- Gustavsen compared the mound to large monuments built by the Nuer people of Sudan following 19th-century smallpox and rinderpest outbreaks, and to megalithic monuments in France and Spain erected after local earthquakes, suggesting a broader pattern of disaster-driven ritual construction.
Why it matters: For archaeologists, the Raknehaugen reinterpretation shifts the analytical lens from Iron Age mounds as elite mortuary monuments to mounds as ritual responses to catastrophe, a framework Gustavsen argues can be applied to other Scandinavian mounds lacking clear burials. The finding also ties Scandinavian archaeology directly to the 6th-century global climate crisis triggered by the 536 AD volcanic eruption.
