Tyra Banks Submits Video Proof In ANTM Defamation Fight — SkimNews
Get the Culture newsletter
Daily culture — film, music, books, the trends and ideas worth your attention. Free.
- Tyra Banks filed opposition Tuesday through Clare Locke lawyers to Netflix's anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss her June defamation suit, presenting video evidence that the three-part docuseries 'Reality Check: Inside America's Next Top Model' altered her words through 'selective deletion, rearrangement, and other editing techniques.'
- Banks' legal team argues the filmmakers cut a nod between a question and her answer about contestant Shandi Sullivan's sexual assault, making Banks appear unable to recall it — when she actually said on camera, 'Um... I do remember her story,' according to the filing.
- The opposition also alleges a 2004 conversation about infidelity was doctored: Sullivan's question was deleted, the order reversed, and a narrator added to imply Banks was prompted by producers, when Sullivan had actually raised the topic herself.
- Banks accuses Netflix, 89 Blocks Holdings, EverWonder Studio, Netflix Music, and directors Daniel Sivan and Mor Loushy of 'willful misconduct,' alleging they 'held the full footage, understood that it contradicted the impressions they were creating, and cut it for the purpose of conveying those false impressions.'
- Banks is suing for false light, defamation by implication, breach of contract, and false endorsement, claiming the February docuseries debut caused 'loss of future business opportunities, loss of business income,' 'severe reputational harm,' and 'significant mental anguish.'
- Netflix, represented by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, will have its motion to dismiss heard in an L.A. court October 30, with the streamer reiterating that Sivan and Loushy are 'respected documentarians' who 'fairly presented' Banks's perspective and vowing to 'vigorously defend' the series.
Why it matters: The October 30 hearing will force a court to weigh whether selectively rearranging interview footage to manufacture false impressions constitutes defamation — a factual question with direct stakes for how documentarians construct narratives from hours of raw tape. Banks alleges specific, quantifiable fallout: lost business opportunities, lost business income, and severe reputational harm she attributes to the February debut.
Ask SkimNews
