Democrats go quiet on climate but push green policies anyway — SkimNews
Get the Energy newsletter
Daily energy & climate — solar, EVs, oil, the policy fights and tech bets shaping the transition. Free.
- Climate-hushing has taken hold among Democrats since Trump's 2024 win and Biden-era clean energy rollbacks, with many candidates dropping explicit climate crisis language from their campaigns despite contradictory polling on voter appetite for the issue.
- Jane Kim, former San Francisco county supervisor and Working Families Party state director, is running for California insurance commissioner on a single-payer disaster insurance plan modeled on programs in New Zealand, France and Spain, citing billion-dollar storms shifting from every 3–4 months to every three weeks.
- William Lawrence, a progressive Democrat and Sunrise Movement co-founder running in Michigan's purple 7th congressional district, is campaigning on a moratorium on new datacenter construction, noting at least 11 datacenters are planned statewide and three hyperscaler-size facilities in his district alone.
- Republican incumbent Tom Barrett, Lawrence's November opponent, previously backed legislation including billions in tax breaks for AI developers and a separate bill limiting federal environmental reviews for datacenters, the American Prospect reported; Barrett has put out ads calling for local control instead.
- Daniel Aldana Cohen, UC Berkeley sociology professor and Climate and Community Institute co-founder, argues climate must be "embedded organically" in the economic issues voters rank highest, warning that "elite consensus alone will not suffice" to build a majority for decarbonization.
- A Data For Progress poll found more than 40% of Michigan residents were "much more likely" to vote for a candidate opposing datacenter buildout — a dynamic Lawrence credits with helping him win 49% of the vote in Mason, site of a planned facility.
Why it matters: California's insurance crisis and Michigan's datacenter boom are tangible local fights over rising costs and infrastructure pressure, giving candidates a politically safer path to climate-aligned policy than explicit climate rhetoric — a strategy that could expand the voter coalition for decarbonization but only if Democrats win on pocketbook terms first.
Ask SkimNews
