The games that show the flaws in a 48-team World Cup
Get the Sports newsletter
Daily sports — scores, transfers, the storylines from the leagues you actually follow. Free.
- The 2026 World Cup's 48-team format requires 72 games to reduce the field from 48 to 32, with eight third-placed teams advancing alongside group winners and runners-up — making it harder to be eliminated than to progress
- Australia vs Paraguay (Thursday) and Austria vs Algeria (Saturday) both feature sides on three points in scenarios where a mutual draw could see both qualify as best third-placed teams
- Bookmakers have priced draws in both fixtures at close to even money, compared with 3-1 to 4-1 for other matches with similar standings such as Ecuador-Germany, Japan-Sweden and Norway-France
- Group J's later kickoff means Austria and Algeria will know exactly what result is needed to qualify and what their potential knockout path looks like — potentially making third place more attractive than second
- The 1982 West Germany-Austria collusion scandal, which saw a 1-0 result knock out Algeria, prompted FIFA to mandate simultaneous final group kickoffs — a safeguard the new 12-group format cannot fully replicate
- 48-team expansion was part of Gianni Infantino's 2016 manifesto, though FIFA rejected an original 16-groups-of-three plan over fears that nations would play for specific results
Why it matters: The format flaw is material because it creates incentive structures where teams can settle for results rather than compete. Austria and Algeria play last in Group J and will know exactly what they need and which knockout opponent awaits — making third place potentially more attractive than second. If both fixtures end in mutual draws, FIFA faces integrity questions about Infantino's 48-team vision turning the group stage's closing matches into calculated exercises.
Ask SkimNews
