The GOP’s $50 billion rural health fund is coming up short, hospital leaders say — SkimNews

Get the Health newsletter
Daily health & science — research, biotech, public health, the studies worth knowing. Free.
- GOP lawmakers included a $50 billion, five-year rural health fund in their tax-cut law to help hospitals weather $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts — a fund equal to just 5% of the cuts, according to hospital leaders who discussed it with members of Congress.
- CMS reshaped the program from direct cash for uncompensated care into competitive grants funding "rural health transformation," adding spending caps, Make America Healthy Again priorities on chronic disease and diet, and an AI push; no more than 15% can go to direct provider incentive payments.
- Hospital leaders including Northern Light Health's Lisa Harvey-McPherson and Randy Clark say the redesigned fund no longer meets the moment, with Clark noting it's hard to think about "transformation" when systems are focused on "survival."
- Recently funded initiatives include drone-based drug deliveries and AI image diagnosis in Alaska, expanded remote patient monitoring in West Virginia, medical equipment upgrades in North Dakota, workforce programs in Alabama, and prenatal services in Indiana.
- Maine has received $30 million for electronic health records, $12 million for community health workforce programs, and $30 million for rural hospital financial footing, though providers like LifeFlight's Thomas Judge say the underlying payment model still needs to be "reengineered."
- Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) pushed to expand the fund to $100 billion and voted against the bill's final passage, while Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has proposed legislation doubling the fund's size and timeline as rural hospital closures loom.
Why it matters: Rural hospitals are receiving 5 cents on the dollar compared with the Medicaid cuts heading their way, and CMS has redirected those dollars toward transformation grants rather than direct operational support — meaning systems already deciding which facilities to close now face a five-year funding stream with strings attached rather than the uncompensated-care bridge providers say they were promised.
Ask SkimNews




