WIRED's Best Smart Glasses 2026: Full Rankings
Get the Tech newsletter
Daily tech — startups, AI labs, chips, the launches that shape the next decade. Free.
- Meta and Ray-Ban sold more than 7 million pairs of smart glasses in 2025, per WIRED, establishing the consumer market that Google, Samsung, and Apple are now entering with their own versions.
- WIRED's 2026 guide (updated August 2026) spans roughly $199 to $499 with use cases ranging from sports sunglasses with HUDs to virtual-screen glasses for gaming and media.
- Honorable mentions include the $199 Lucyd Reebok Octane (8-hour battery, polarized Bluetooth sunglasses for cyclists and runners) and $299 RayNeo Air 3s Pro with a 201-inch virtual screen at 120 Hz.
- The $429 Rokid Max 2 projects a 215-inch display and supports diopter focus dials, though WIRED found persistent edge blurring and noted the clip-on blackout shield over electrochromic dimming.
- WIRED recommends avoiding the $699 Asus AirVision M1 for a small in-focus sweet spot and 72 Hz refresh cap, plus Halliday Glasses for causing headaches with a laggy ring controller and poor AI.
- Solos AirGo Vision ($299) pairs a ChatGPT-powered AI assistant with a camera for translation and navigation, but WIRED rated photo and audio quality 'horrible' and said the Ray-Ban Meta glasses do the same things better.
- The category traces back to Google Glass, which pivoted from consumer failure into industrial use after a decade, with earlier AR entrants like Magic Leap collapsing under clunky hardware and unmet hype.
Why it matters: With Meta/Ray-Ban having validated 7 million pairs of consumer demand in 2025 and Google, Samsung, and Apple preparing entries, smart glasses are shifting from niche experiment to mainstream category — but WIRED's 'avoid' list, including the $699 Asus AirVision M1 and the headache-inducing Halliday Glasses, shows premium pricing still doesn't guarantee usable design or refresh rates above 72 Hz.
