Judge Narrows NCAA Eligibility Ruling, Excludes Pro Players
Get the Sports newsletter
Daily sports — scores, transfers, the storylines from the leagues you actually follow. Free.
- Judge Charlotte Sweeney issued a clarification Sunday to her Friday ruling that granted a fifth year of eligibility to athletes who graduated high school in 2022 and were excluded from the NCAA's new five-season rule for Division I players.
- Sweeney clarified the ruling does not cover football players who signed pro contracts this summer and then had second thoughts, and made no changes to the NCAA's rules on pro contracts, transfer portal timing, or elements of the House lawsuit settlement.
- The original Friday ruling had the potential to upend the college football season by immediately extending the so-called "five for five" rule, prompting media reports listing NFL and CFL players who signaled openness to returning to school.
- NCAA president Charlie Baker called the initial ruling "chaos-inducing" and used it to argue for passage of the Protect College Sports Act, a Senate bill that would give the NCAA lawsuit protection over eligibility rules.
- College football teams face a calculated risk: bring back players under Sweeney's order and potentially lose them mid-season if the NCAA's coming appeal succeeds, while baseball programs have more time because their seasons haven't started.
- The Denver federal court is one of several venues where the NCAA is defending its eligibility rules, framing Sweeney's order as part of a broader legal landscape rather than an isolated decision.
Why it matters: Hundreds of NFL and CFL players had been floated as potential returnees after Sweeney's initial ruling, but her Sunday clarification shut that door. Schools now must weigh whether to bring athletes back under the current ruling knowing the NCAA's pending appeal could declare those players ineligible mid-season, disrupting rosters after football camps have already begun.
