Rolling Stone hits hysterical note suggesting Putin NATO attack nigh
Get the Geopolitics newsletter
Daily geopolitics — wars, elections, sanctions, the diplomatic moves that move markets. Free.
- Rolling Stone's Mac William Bishop argued Trump's "contempt for allies and unwillingness to defend Europe" has given Putin a window to wage war on NATO, driven by "megalomania" and a desire to "remove NATO from the geopolitical chessboard."
- Bishop's own quoted sources undercut the thesis: a NATO official told him "I wouldn't say that we're seeing anything remarkably different than we've seen before," and military expert Michael Kofman called direct Russian assaults on NATO states "low likelihood possibilities."
- Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsakhna stated last week that "neither Estonia nor NATO sees any indication that Russia is preparing a large-scale military attack against the Alliance," citing Russia's struggles in Ukraine and NATO deterrence.
- The "limited incursion" scenario — typically framed as a rapid Russian advance into Estonia — is the most-developed threat model in Bishop's piece, betting NATO members would not wage full-scale war over a sliver of eastern-flank territory.
- Bishop's evidence base includes Trump's 1987 full-page newspaper ad accusing U.S. allies of free-riding, which the critiquing piece dismisses as anodyne burden-shifting concerns rather than proof of a Putin green light.
Why it matters: The debate carries direct policy weight: if alarmist Russia-NATO-war narratives dominate, they crowd out the harder diplomatic work of redistributing defense burdens across the alliance and managing Europe's most destructive conflict since 1945 — work the piece argues is being distorted rather than advanced by coverage like Rolling Stone's.
Ask SkimNews
